This was enough to convince me that Ubisoft doesn't make very good games. Of course, this isnt Vikings Creed, its Assassins Creed and that means Eivors story will pull them into the war between the Assassin Brotherhood and Templar Order in some capacity. I won't buy another Assassin's Creed game. Why would you make up fake facts about monuments, families, fights etc? Wouldn't people be better off to learn something true about Italian history while playing the game? Using real monument names but bogus facts is really dissapointed. I dont know if anyone has done this on the forum before but this must be where they got the inspiration for the Assassins. The maxim of the Assassin Brotherhood, 'Nothing is true everything is. I mean, you have a game in ancient Rome, that in itself is very cool. The same 'problem' is also explicitly addressed by the Assassin's Creed series. Does someone at Ubisoft heard of a game called Red Dead Redemption? they should go have a look at high quality graphics and then make thier game.Īnother very annoying thing is the fake history facts that are used in the game. The new Assassin's Creed Brotherhood as the SAME issues as the previous one. First, the controls are awkward, the jumps don't alswys make sense, the graphics could be improved. Although the Brotherhood is weak leading up to the events of Assassins Creed Syndicate, the modern-day Assassins mission to locate Pieces of Eden and protect them from the Templars continues. I dont know if anyone has done this on the forum before but this must be where they got the inspiration for the Assassins. I played the previous Assassin's Creed, and I didn't like a few things about it.